Attorney General To Argue His First Case Before State Supreme Court
OLYMPIA - Attorney General Rob McKenna will personally present the state’s arguments next Tuesday in Madison v. State of Washington. It will be his first argument as attorney general before the Washington Supreme Court.
The state seeks to overturn King County Superior Court Judge Michael Spearman’s ruling that Washington’s current felon disenfranchisement law is unconstitutional because it requires felons to complete all the terms of their sentences– including payment of financial obligations such as crime victims' restitution– before they regain their right to vote.
McKenna will argue that, under the U.S. Constitution and the Washington State Constitution, each state may disenfranchise felons and each may establish its own criteria for disenfranchisement and re-enfranchisement that requires felons to complete the terms of their sentences.
“Washington state law requires that convicted felons comply with all court-imposed sentencing requirements, including paying restitution to crime victims, before the felon may be re-enfranchised,” McKenna said.
The state will argue that under the ‘rational basis test’ which the U.S. Supreme Court applies to felon disenfranchisement statutes, it is rational for the Legislature to deny felons the right to vote until they have completed their entire court-ordered sentences.
“That includes payment of criminal penalties, victim's restitution, and legal fees,” McKenna said. “The state should not be required to separate out the various aspects of a criminal sentence.”
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear Madison v. State of Washington at 2:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27. Both sides are scheduled to present their cases for 30 minutes. TVW will cover the arguments live.
Contact Pittsburgh lawyers
now and obtain a free case evaluation.
| |
 Did You Know? |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mediation may not be the most appropriate avenue for resolution in all cases.
For example, it may not be appropriate in cases where: A definitive or authoritative resolution of the matter is required; The matter involves or may bear upon significant questions of Government policy that require additional procedures before a final resolution may be made; Maintaining established policies that apply to many people is especially important; The matter significantly affects persons or groups who are not parties to the process; A full public record of the proceeding is important; or The agency must maintain continuing jurisdiction over the matter with authority to alter the disposition of the matter in light of changed circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
